As a learner...being a part of a SOLE feels fantastic. As the 'teacher' in our faculty meetings or in a classroom with students, well....the idea of SOLE seems not so great. Why is that?
As a learner, I love the idea of being able to pursue questions that captivate me. I enjoy being a involved with a collective that I want to be a part of, and being able move along when I feel that I have more to contribute to another group. I like connecting with others, to find articles, to question research, to exchange ideas of how to design and implement a concept for our schools, or to simply shoot the breeze about something that we are working on. When I am in this sort of learning environment, it is incredibly relaxed, highly productive, and oddly self regulating--we absolutely get off task sometimes, but one of us always brings the group back to the task at hand. These less focused moments are essential--a kind of pressure release that allows the learning system to re-calibrate itself--but we always get back to it.
My feelings fit well with data I have collected from workshops that I have done where we consider the results of a typical 'They Learn Best When'; an exercise that I got from the Instructional Rounds program at Harvard and now use with teachers and administrators.
So why do I get so nervous about letting my learners engage in SOLE when I know they are the very environment that my best learning occurs? Is it because I don't trust the participants?
In thinking about this a great deal, I have come to realize that my discomfort with SOLE is mostly because I don't trust ME. I don't trust that I have asked a question that is compelling enough for the learners in the room. I don't always trust that the task that I have set up is one that will require the learning and participation of each student in the room. And as a result, I am often reluctant to relinquish control in the way that a true SOLE requires, even if I KNOW that I am likely not creating a very dynamic learning situation. Pathetic, I know.
I think I am getting better with letting go, and letting the SOLE take its course. And one of the things that has allowed me to do become more comfortable with leading SOLE is to co-create questions, and co-create the activities that we will be doing as a larger group. I think the High Tech High Project Tuning Protocol is an excellent tool/model that can be adapted to formatively assess whether a question is truly a driving question, and whether the task and potential learning products are ones that the group will find meaningful--meaningful enough to bring them back from those moments of off-task, 'pressure release' that I alluded to above.
This year, I want to model SOLE more, and use the HTH Tuning Protocol to help guide my questions, my faculty meetings, and my presentations. And while there are some pieces that make me nervous, I need to accept that 'control' does not equal learning.
Here is an excellent video describing SOLE: